The legalization of marijuana has been debated for a extended bit.
The "worthy marijuana conversation" goes on, with no less than Barack Obama Moving the hornet's lair. The Head of the state failed to reply directly a inquiring approximately marijuana, Moving hypothesis that he favours legalizing the Narcotic. As the topic of if to legalize marijuana has been argued for so far-off and so much, many arguments and counter-arguments exist.
Both Sides' Arguments
Balky answers to the investigation "Would you wish your children to smoke marijuana?" are the most convincing arguments of those who reason the legalization of marijuana.Critics argue that marijuana is a hazard not only to users but also to those around them, similar to second-hand tobacco smoke. They also cite statistics that link marijuana usage to crime and driving accidents, saying marijuana affects the ability to concentrate, stay alert, coordinate and react, making it difficult to judge distances, read signs and react to signals. Proponents argue that the same happens with consumption of alcohol and at times with tobacco smoking, both of which are legal.
Following Tobacco and Alcohol
The anti-legalization side argues that marijuana is addictive and a health hazard, eliciting a pro-legalization discussion that counters "peerless whether taken Often and in excessive doses." The critics cite studies that link the Narcotic to cancer, respiratory problems, feelings defilement and damage to the resistant system, noting that short-term hazards include memory loss, distorted perception and loss of motor skill. The proponents say marijuana helps increase appetite and relieve symptoms of glaucoma, with the critics countering there are better drugs for these conditions. Proponents for legalization argue that if marijuana is grown legally, cures for other ills could be found.
Hazards to Others
On the other side, the money debate is most convincing, where estimates are trumped-up both on possible law-enforcement reserves and on viable revenue generated from taxes on growing, producing and consuming marijuana. Proponents argue that considering most lawbreakers caught using marijuana excite lone a "slap on the wrist" besides, funds and revenue might besides be realized.
Health Arguments
Proponents say limitations on alcohol consumption and tobacco smoking can be imposed on marijuana use. An age limit can be imposed, and there can be restricted-use locales besides as mandated labels on packaging citing marijuana's potential health dangers. The critics counter that alcohol and tobacco are not as dangerous and do not lead to deadlier drugs later in life, alleging besides that proponents for legalization aim to receive stronger drugs legalized later.
Gateway Arguments
Critics cite studies that indicate few users of drugs other than marijuana have done so without first having tried marijuana. They conclude that marijuana leads to the use of more dangerous, harder drugs, such as cocaine and heroin. Proponents argue that not all marijuana users end up using the stronger drugs and not all users of stronger drugs have tried marijuana. The critics counter that marijuana takes away inhibitions to drug use and promotes a culture that allows the use of other drugs.
